Legend Zero Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Source for all of this is Org/DGzhttp://img404.imageshack.us/img404/9871/3bhv.jpg"The rules concerning Deck Construction for official tournaments will change in the latter part of September 2013, check V-Jump on sale the 21st of August for news on this and the Forbidden and Limited List!"It also mentions at least Japan and South East Asia and the Phillipines will be getting an overhaul in the Tournament System. (the favorite theory is the East getting the West tournament structure) :o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve The Bug Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Maybe they are just increasing the extra deck size? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Althemia Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 It most probably is an expansion to the Extra Deck size because of so many synchros and Xyzs coming out. Wouldn't be surprised if they decided to try and limit it to 10 of each type (if you are to play 16-20) and expand it to 20.Of course, it may just also be a convoluted way of saying they're changing the banlist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 I'd like to see deck min size be increased. Going up to 60 and making it a 4 card min would be interesting. I can't see the extra deck increasing in size. While it might be SUPER cramped, its a free resource and is VERY dangerous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 It could be something which has a new take on the ban list. Maybe a rotation system or even something like a "Super Limited" type thing, where you can only run 1 of the chosen cards in the Super Limited section. For example SUPER LIMITED Pot of Greed Monster Reborn Heavy Storm Lets just choose these, you can only run 1 of these cards. If you choose Pot of Greed, you cannot run Monster Reborn or Heavy Storm. If you choose Heavy Storm, you cannot run Pot of Greed or Monster Reborn etc etc I dunno, I'm.just shoving stupid ideas out of the way really Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 It most probably is an expansion to the Extra Deck size because of so many synchros and Xyzs coming out. Wouldn't be surprised if they decided to try and limit it to 10 of each type (if you are to play 16-20) and expand it to 20. Of course, it may just also be a convoluted way of saying they're changing the banlist. If its like that IDK if they will also effect it with fusions or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve The Bug Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Nah Koko that would be grammatically incorrect. It says "this and the Forbidden and Limited List!" implying that this is something else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.codex Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 What do you really think the chances of them changing a part of the game that has been set from pretty much the very start will be? It will change all the video games and how they work too. I doubt they will change the size limits. I mean, "Deck Construction" could mean a lot of things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve The Bug Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 I don't think changing the extra-deck rules would have a serious impact on the game considering that already changed them once. There used to not be a limit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 I'd like to see deck min size be increased. Going up to 60 and making it a 4 card min would be interesting. I can't see the extra deck increasing in size. While it might be SUPER cramped, its a free resource and is VERY dangerous. That'd give birth to a really complicated thing. Having a new type of limited section in the banlist that lets you just use 3 copies of something (It might or might not happen if that was the case, and it'd be very annoying to follow all those nitpickings, but it'd be possible to think about it). I wonder what that is about, my mind goes around with a lot of possibilities. -Changing the copies per deck of cards. -Changing Extra Deck or Main Deck limit/minimum. -Changing what Levels require what Tributes. -Maybe a limit to the Special Summoning. -Maybe changing how even phases of a turn are dealt with. IDK, I'm really curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Lets throw caution to the wind and make the Main Deck's minimum be 50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 An extra deck size increase seems the most plausible, but perhaps it is something more. I really like Koko's idea, it might help to diversify the game a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted August 7, 2013 Report Share Posted August 7, 2013 Why would they punish decks who just use one type of card by making it so they have to use only 10 of that card as suggested about the extra deck rule. What if they only want to use Synchros, Fusions, or their deck requires a large amount of specific XYZs like a deck such as ZWs does? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 Maybe is something regarding a new type of card? Since I don't think that Zexal will last for much long... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 Maybe is something regarding a new type of card? Since I don't think that Zexal will last for much long... Nah I think ZeXal still has a while to go, personally. Btw, there is a pattern of coinsidence made by TCG booster packs. From "Legend of the Blue-Eyes White Dragon" to "Flaming Eternity" is 14 booster packs. That's how long DM lasted. From "The Lost Millenium" to "Light of Destruction" is 13 booster packs. That's how long GX lasted. From "The Duelist Genesis" to "Extreme Victory" is 12 booster packs. That's how long 5Ds lasted. From "Generation Force" to "Legacy of the Valiant" is 11 packs. If the pattern goes as follows, that should be the end of ZeXal. Most likely though, it's gonna go beyond that. They want to keep it for as long as they can. Kazuki Takahashi wanted 5Ds to be the last, and it was originally gonna be a lot longer, if not for outside reasons. IDK what his stance on ZeXal was, but the people in charge of it probably want to extend it as much as possible before going back to him to ask for another generation. Besides, story-wise, Yuma barely has half the numbers, and Don Thousand is still way over the level of the heroes, and the trip for Astral and Kazuma is still not even hinted at, if they can even get to the Astral World. Among other unresolved bits of the plot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 Besides, story-wise, Yuma barely has half the numbers, and Don Thousand is still way over the level of the heroes, and the trip for Astral and Kazuma is still not even hinted at, if they can even get to the Astral World. Among other unresolved bits of the plot. Yuma goes to the Astral World in a couple of episodes, with the help of V and Kaito. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 Yuma goes to the Astral World in a couple of episodes, with the help of V and Kaito. Oh really?... *clear throat* Sooo... what's the next show probably gonna be called then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 Oh really?... *clear throat* Oh yeah, and the conqueror's coins from the ruins are also relevant in that part of the story as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerion Brightflame Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 Something that's been floating about in a lot of Fake banlists is this: Part with Dragon Rulers says that you can only have 6 "Dragon Ruler" cards in your deck. So essentially the Vanguard deck restrictions for YGO. What do people think of that idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 Something that's been floating about in a lot of Fake banlists is this: Part with Dragon Rulers says that you can only have 6 "Dragon Ruler" cards in your deck. So essentially the Vanguard deck restrictions for YGO. What do people think of that idea. It would make sense considering that Konami really don't want to put all 8 cards on a ban list. A special consideration section would help ease the ban list too (especially with Exodia) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted August 9, 2013 Report Share Posted August 9, 2013 I don't think it's that great of an idea. It's already tedious to keep track of a banlist, a limited list, and a semi-limited list when following specific exceptions to the "3 copies of whatever you want" rule that should be set in stone but can't because of bad design. Let alone go that way and have a group of cards restricted by rule of the game as if they were anything other than another archetype like any other. Absurdly powerful, but still just an archetype. Lightsworns back in the day, people also didn't really know what exactly the hits should be, or Blackwings when starting out, or TeleDAD. Dragon Rulers will go down in a more subtile way (probably). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted August 10, 2013 Report Share Posted August 10, 2013 I still don't know what the hits should have been for Blackwings, but Whirlwind was a free card every turn in a Deck that could completely abuse it. E-Dragons have four of them. The babies are not a problem without piles of grown-ups. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted August 11, 2013 Report Share Posted August 11, 2013 Looking at the whole deck construction rule I been testing out Duels with 60 card duels and such (will be testing 50 card duels at some point) to see how it effects the game if it does come to that being the big rule change on deck construction. because the deck size increase at the moment is the most likely thing to occur at this point of time for the rule change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted August 11, 2013 Report Share Posted August 11, 2013 If the deck sized was increased to 60........This game will become slightly weird. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted August 11, 2013 Report Share Posted August 11, 2013 If the deck sized was increased to 60.... .... This game will become slightly weird. Inb4 Konami implements a 60 card highlander format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.