Dad Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 Trumpster still has a huge gain over the other two, and his numbers went up AFTER he declared support for Planmed Parenthood...Republicans cheer when he said it cause of the elegant manor in which his phrased it. I honestly regret voting Hillary Yesterday, won't make that mistake in the general if Trump's still inIf you wanna talk about media bias, tell me why they're portraying Trump as a KKK supporter STILL, after he disavowed it over 6 days ago :I Yeah I even tried to vow for Trump's disavowed relationship with them even tho I don't like the guy. But social media isn't the place to do that because everyone and their mama knows everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cr47t Posted March 2, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 Wait, WInter, why'd you vote for hillary? I thought you would have went for trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 4, 2016 Report Share Posted March 4, 2016 Wait, WInter, why'd you vote for hillary? I thought you would have went for trump.I was disappointed with Trump's debate performance and I want him to flush out his policies Also 98% of my family are hard Hillary backers, so that does rub off 11th Debate: Sigh, Trump take notes from Kasich Megyn mis-fact checked though, definitely not a D- rating but really, defending your dick size? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tentacruel Posted March 4, 2016 Report Share Posted March 4, 2016 How in the hell are people saying Trump supports the KKK? People need to stop with the hyperbole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 4, 2016 Report Share Posted March 4, 2016 How in the hell are people saying Trump supports the KKK? People need to stop with the hyperbole. Oh please, the liberal idea of fixing a problem is to plug their ears and pretend that it doesn't exist. Is it really such a huge step from going from ignorance and denial to slander? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goose Posted March 4, 2016 Report Share Posted March 4, 2016 Oh please, the liberal idea of fixing a problem is to plug their ears and pretend that it doesn't exist. Is it really such a huge step from going from ignorance and denial to slander? That's in no way true. If you want to generalize sheet, at least make it remotely accurate. You could say "Liberals see problems where they don't exist" not the other way around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 4, 2016 Report Share Posted March 4, 2016 That's in no way true. If you want to generalize sheet, at least make it remotely accurate. You could say "Liberals see problems where they don't exist" not the other way around.That's not true. Liberals tend to realize the problems, they just are reluctant to get their hands dirty. Republicans don't see the problems are but willing to get their hands dirty. Donald Trump is the perfect mix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted March 4, 2016 Report Share Posted March 4, 2016 How in the hell are people saying Trump supports the KKK? People need to stop with the hyperbole.Because he didn't immediately disown a former Grandmaster of the KKK when asked questions about him asking KKK members to support Trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 4, 2016 Report Share Posted March 4, 2016 Because he didn't immediately disown a former Grandmaster of the KKK when asked questions about him asking KKK members to support Trump.No, but he did immediately disavow after the talkshow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted March 5, 2016 Report Share Posted March 5, 2016 No, but he did immediately disavow after the talkshowI was giving the reasoning people use for that question. At least he did disavow, though I wonder how much that really matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted March 5, 2016 Report Share Posted March 5, 2016 So far in today's installment, Cruz beats Trump in Kansas and is leading in Maine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted March 5, 2016 Report Share Posted March 5, 2016 So far in today's installment, Cruz beats Trump in Kansas and is leading in Maine. sheet show incoming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 5, 2016 Report Share Posted March 5, 2016 Guess people want the religious troglodyte over the brash, but logical billionaire. As a Midwesterner, I've never been more ashamed Let's see if Hills can beat scarecrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 Update: Sanders wins Nebraska with 75% reporting and Clinton leads in Louisiana with 1% reporting. Also, Trump leads Louisiana with the votes starting to come in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 Trump won Louisiana and leads Kentucky by 6% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 Final results on the Democrats side: Sanders wins Kansas and Nebraska while Clinton wins Louisiana. Great night for Sanders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerion Brightflame Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 It wasn't really; He's 10 delegates further down, because yet again he wins victories in small states whilst Hillary crushes in the bigger states. She won more in her Louisiana victory than Bernies did in Kansas and Nebraska together. Winning states is a great thing, but he needs to start getting big wins in states that matter if he's going to close the 200 delegate gap that currently exists. Because it's delegate counts that matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 It wasn't really; He's 10 delegates further down, because yet again he wins victories in small states whilst Hillary crushes in the bigger states. She won more in her Louisiana victory than Bernies did in Kansas and Nebraska together. Winning states is a great thing, but he needs to start getting big wins in states that matter if he's going to close the 200 delegate gap that currently exists. Because it's delegate counts that matters.Hillary has mainly been winning Red States that she won't win in the general election if she gets the nomination. Sanders has mainly been winning Blue States and Swing States. If you are worried about Sanders not winning big states, most of them are coming still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 Trump won Kentucky :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cr47t Posted March 6, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 Trump won Kentucky :)That really shouldn't be a surprise.I personally dont give a damn about Trump's record of winning, he acts as that is the main thing that matters in the race. It sure as f*** is not. Personally, I care about he wants to do as president, and what he wants to do as president could seriously hurt the US if implemented and used. I'd rather have an establishment that gets good stuff done than a guy like donald; politics is not a game, its not an comedy show, its a serious field of how the world works. We need someone who dosen't think it's all about him but dosen't restrict himself for the sake of reputation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 That really shouldn't be a surprise.I personally dont give a damn about Trump's record of winning, he acts as that is the main thing that matters in the race. It sure as f*** is not. Personally, I care about he wants to do as president, and what he wants to do as president could seriously hurt the US if implemented and used. I'd rather have an establishment that gets good stuff done than a guy like donald; politics is not a game, its not an comedy show, its a serious field of how the world works. We need someone who dosen't think it's all about him but dosen't restrict himself for the sake of reputation.History is favorable to the victorious, not the losers. Which Policies? The one where he's taking a more liberal stance than congress in an attempt to prevent Daesh from taking further American lives, or the one where he's trying to uphold the law, and has been willing to give leeway to criminals with families? If there is any reason to not like Trump is should be his support of the Death Penalty, but Trump is easily the best candidate in the field. You want an establishment that gets stuff done? Why are you voting at all then? Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans have been getting anything done, and why even consider sanders if you want to get something done...Obama had to sell his soul to get a half-ass'd version of socialized healthcare passed, good luck getting the whole economy to turn to socialism. Or are you referring to Mexico paying for the wall? When you have a 60 Billion USD Trade Deficit with Mexico and are a VIP trade partner for them, you can squeeze them and they can't afford to muscle you on that. Let Mexico starve itself, when their children start dropping due to their trade policies they'll have to come around. It's unprofitable to fight a 8-12 billion dollar investment when you're working with numbers 5-6 times that yearly As for torture. Listen to Trump's recent debates, he said he would honor the law, but would fight to change it. And by god we need to. We are fighting animals and trying to be decent while doing it. Geneva has no role in this war with Terror. We need to get our hands dirty and clean up the filth that we have created. If that means changing the law to allow waterboarding and targeting of the terrorist families, so be it. Assad and Putin are one of few people who realize how to deal with this slime. ANYWAY Trump only got 53 delegates to Cruz's 69. If you're so against Trump's policies, enjoy another 4 years of having Cruz involve US Soldiers in every other war Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 "When you have a 60 Billion USD Trade Deficit with Mexico and are a VIP trade partner for them, you can squeeze them and they can't afford to muscle you on that. Let Mexico starve itself, when their children start dropping due to their trade policies they'll have to come around." You know what, no country has the funking right to squeeze another country economically for not doing what they want. It's funking despicable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 "When you have a 60 Billion USD Trade Deficit with Mexico and are a VIP trade partner for them, you can squeeze them and they can't afford to muscle you on that. Let Mexico starve itself, when their children start dropping due to their trade policies they'll have to come around." You know what, no country has the funking right to squeeze another country economically for not doing what they want. It's funking despicable.I'm a third generation American. I owe my loyalty and life to only one country. If they want to violate my country and disrespect that friendship, then I don't care how hard Trump squeezes Mexico. Anyway you make it sound like it's not constantly going on. Where the sanctions against Russia wrong? What about North Korea? We economically squeezed them to stop them from doing what they wanted to do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerion Brightflame Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 I'm a third generation American. I owe my loyalty and life to only one country. If they want to violate my country and disrespect that friendship, then I don't care how hard Trump squeezes Mexico. Anyway you make it sound like it's not constantly going on. Where the sanctions against Russia wrong? What about North Korea? We economically squeezed them to stop them from doing what they wanted to do There's a difference between squeezing countries that are a threat to the safety of the rest of the world, and to the very liberty of other countries, and squeezing a country to make them finance a wall to 'stop' illegal immigration? A wall that isn't for there benefit, and if anything is just abig symbol saying 'You are inferior to us'. The sanctions on Russia and NK work to prevent a war. Sanctions on Mexico are just bullying for the sake of bullying. That's the exact sort of thing that would radicalise a country against you. Not maybe religious radicalisation, but political sure? Do you think it's a shock that in times of poor economy right wing parties screaming about immigrants being a source of problems do better? All it takes is the right man stroking the right idea, and you get a new country out to make the US suffer. Which is ironic because it is what is happening in the US now. Poor economy, and people are being convinced to blame thescary outside world, and to bully them into submission to make 'out country great again'. I hate to be the one to say this, but the parallels to the build up of Nazi Germany are not uncanny. Even the war on Terror is an example of this kind of fear-mongering bullshit. It's been so wildly blown out of proportion by now people are over-looking the wider domestic issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted March 6, 2016 Report Share Posted March 6, 2016 "If they want to violate my country and disrespect that friendship, then I don't care how hard Trump squeezes Mexico. Anyway you make it sound like it's not constantly going on. Where the sanctions against Russia wrong? What about North Korea? We economically squeezed them to stop them from doing what they wanted to do." Squeeze a country to do something they don't want to do vs squeeze a country for doing something bad. Simplistic, yes. North Korea is squeezed because their government's nuclear program is a threat to everyone else. Russia is squeezed because their government took Crimea from Ukraine and has allegedly supported rebels in East Ukraine. So, you are saying Mexico should be grouped together with them for not wanting to pay for a wall? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.