Phantom Roxas Posted September 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 8, 2013 I'm referring to the ribbons that may or may not actually be a second set of ears. We did just see Roman is setting up a plan, but I think the next episode will be meant as a sort of counterpart to episode 3, showing how Team RWBY interacts with each other in comparison to last time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tormented Posted September 9, 2013 Report Share Posted September 9, 2013 Okay, so I'm just going to drop in and say I really enjoyed Ep. 8 nice to seem some action, and the two main teams we now of working together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Tigerwolf Posted September 11, 2013 Report Share Posted September 11, 2013 Watch the 4 Trailers, then Episode 1 - 8....and I think that's about a regular intro + a little over a 1 hour special...and it actually has a lot of information + action when you watch it like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted September 11, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 11, 2013 The trailers are just teasers, so I wouldn't count them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake the Sage Posted September 12, 2013 Report Share Posted September 12, 2013 The trailers are just teasers, so I wouldn't count them. Since when hasn't trailers been just teasers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTFauKorean Posted September 12, 2013 Report Share Posted September 12, 2013 my insight on RWBY is...We all know, Monty Oum is great at action sequences, when when comes to his other works, it's more or less, so and so, fights this and such in this and that scenario. The story really comes to a minimum. However...because rooster teeth would be helping him, even though it is Monty's own project, at first I thought that great story telling can come hand in hand with great action sequences and create an amazing thing. I Post-result...With both impressed and disappointing. why?Yes Monty did make his fluid animations and character design exceed all expectationsbut when it comes to character development, dialogue and plot, it comes off as a little too... Animu Why is that a bad thing? I like anime cliches....Don't get me wrong I like the Anime gimmicks and cliches, but coming from Monty and the RT crew some would expect a breath of fresh airBoth parties have a very unique kind of way they do things, extremely difficult to duplicate and even harder to innovate on top of. The potential is so impressive that it's impossible to not feel a little disappointed, when you find out it's pretty much something you've seen before in, let's say advent children, with slightly more fast paced and Monty Esq animations. Overall I'd say... If you just want to see the Monty action then I'd recommend, but if you're looking for a refreshing change of pace I'd look elsewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shradow Posted September 12, 2013 Report Share Posted September 12, 2013 That seems like a silly complaint to me. Normally you'd be okay by this kind of series, but just because it's by RT, it's somehow worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTFauKorean Posted September 12, 2013 Report Share Posted September 12, 2013 That seems like a silly complaint to me. Normally you'd be okay by this kind of series, but just because it's by RT, it's somehow worse. I didn't say it was Worse, as in it's bad, I actually like RWBY, just more in the sense that it's still, your classic can't hate Monty. I said, I expected an RT contribution (if you notice how they do their screen plays) to put a little more thought into something way more original. It's made in the style that is like to be a much shorter series, which means less room for foreshadowing. Kind of like your average 21 episode seasons for your typical anime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted September 12, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 12, 2013 Since when hasn't trailers been just teasers? I know, but I'm disagreeing with Hyobu's suggestion that we should count the trailers as a part of the run time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jord200 Posted September 12, 2013 Report Share Posted September 12, 2013 Give it some time. Rome wasn't built in a day. Everything starts off small. I heard a rumor that the epsiode today will be like episode 3, only now that the teams have been formed, and Weiss is starting to show her nice side, it should be much more interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnubisHaxx Posted September 12, 2013 Report Share Posted September 12, 2013 just wanna drop in and say that yang is my favorite and ive watched her trailer like 6 times cuz shes soooooooo badass. and also you guys really should read the wikia more. rt made it in the first place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted September 12, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 12, 2013 Guys, we were wrong all along. They aren't based on fairy tales, they're the Fantastic Four. Ruby is Mister Fantastic, and Yang is the Human Torch. So between Weiss and Blake, who is the Thing, and who is the Invisible Woman? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shradow Posted September 13, 2013 Report Share Posted September 13, 2013 Dat Achieve Men poster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eury Posted September 13, 2013 Report Share Posted September 13, 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plaAGdmLsVA&list=FLdbdb1RUhWVp0iTqFvgraOg&feature=mh_lolz HRNGH SO GOOD also, Blake and Ruby were cute as hell in Ep 9. Well, Ruby's been cute every episode, BUT BLAKE IS GETTING THERE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thar Posted September 13, 2013 Report Share Posted September 13, 2013 Guys, we were wrong all along. They aren't based on fairy tales, they're the Fantastic Four. Ruby is Mister Fantastic, and Yang is the Human Torch. So between Weiss and Blake, who is the Thing, and who is the Invisible Woman? Weiss is Invisible Woman, hands down. But that would be unfair to Blake, cause she ain't solid or bulky in any way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted September 13, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 13, 2013 Wait, Ben Grimm is typically referred to as the "Ever-lovin' blue-eyed Thing", so it has to be Weiss. [spoiler=I DARE you to accuse me of nitpicking on this one, and actually mean it.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shradow Posted September 13, 2013 Report Share Posted September 13, 2013 Bwahahaha, that's hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted September 13, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 13, 2013 This is a whole new level of incompetence. They couldn't be consistent with the models of four of the five characters they actually bothered to make detailed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thar Posted September 13, 2013 Report Share Posted September 13, 2013 I didn't even notice it. Hell, even after you pointed it out, I didn't. I don't really care, either, cause I laughed throughout this entire episode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shradow Posted September 13, 2013 Report Share Posted September 13, 2013 He does have a point. I was watching that gif for a good 15 seconds before I could tell what it was supposed to be showing me. Granted, it's still a fairly large oversight once pointed out, and this isn't any excuse for it, but I can't imagine the majority of viewers noticed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted September 13, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 13, 2013 I didn't even notice it. Hell, even after you pointed it out, I didn't. I don't really care, either, cause I laughed throughout this entire episode. So, what, you're saying it's okay to completely neglect to have characters in the outfits they're supposed to be wearing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shradow Posted September 13, 2013 Report Share Posted September 13, 2013 Unless I've lost the ability to read, he merely said he didn't notice nor care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thar Posted September 13, 2013 Report Share Posted September 13, 2013 So, what, you're saying it's okay to completely neglect to have characters in the outfits they're supposed to be wearing? If I had f*cks to give about what the characters were wearing for whatever reason, it'd have to be given at gunpoint while my head was latched to a table. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted September 13, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 13, 2013 He does have a point. I was watching that gif for a good 15 seconds before I could tell what it was supposed to be showing me. Granted, it's still a fairly large oversight once pointed out, and this isn't any excuse for it, but I can't imagine the majority of viewers noticed it. Yeah, I didn't want to point it out because I figured you'd be able to figure it out on your own. I know it's only for a brief moment, but it shows a lack of care if you're not going to keep something as simple as what character model you're supposed to use consistent for five minutes. Unless I've lost the ability to read, he merely said he didn't notice nor care. But he's dismissing it like it means nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shradow Posted September 13, 2013 Report Share Posted September 13, 2013 Well it obviously means nothing to him. Heck, I'll probably forget about it in half an hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.